True EMF Solutions

EMF Solutions

Dr David Carpenter

by

 On Public Utility Smart Meters – “Evidence Suggests these Meters May be Dangerous to Our Bodies and the Environment”  Dr. David O. Carpenter, Director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at SUNY Albany, lays out the evidence for the serious human biological effects of electro-magnetic field exposure from electric power lines, cell phones and wi-fi technology summarized in the BioInitiative Report.

From Del. Glen Glass: Maryland (Below the video is a warning from California) Please read!

Dear Constituents,

One of my bills, which may be the most important I have introduced, is House Bill 878 – “Public Utilities – Smart Meter Opt-Out Option” bill. The utility companies are replacing our meters with Smart Meters. (Should be an opt -in!)

One of several problems I see, is there is evidence that suggests these meters may be dangerous to our bodies and the environment. In addition, these meters are very intrusive because they monitor what is happening in the home and also give the utility companies the ability to shut your electric off at any time. Because of this and other reasons I believe we have the right to choose to opt-out but a law needs to be established to protect our citizens.

WARNING FROM CALIFORNIA.

Teams of Utility Company shills and Industry shills in Northern California are entering web articles, acting as regular people, to influence people who are not aware of the full problems of these so-called smart meters.

Even the PG$E Director of Smart Meters, William Devereaux, was caught shilling, faking & hiding his PG$E identity on websites, and he was forced to resign. PG$E pretended that he was an isolated incident, but evidence shows it is PG$E corporate strategy.

Don’t know about Maryland, but be aware of the possibility and likely strategy from your utility company.

Shills typically add NO information. Rather they make clever derogatory statements about others.

They also frequently label any information that is contrary to the Utility company lies as fear mongering. When Patrick Henry road his horse from town to town yelling “The British are coming,” these same shills would have accused him of fear mongering.

There are small groups making $ Billions of dollars on these pricy dumb-death-meters and then there are many other honest people spending their own time and money researching and communicating to others the problems and damage these so-called smart meters do. It is a compliment when the shills attack, since shills typically attack those whose information and communications are accurate and effective.

Thank you Del. Glen Glass for what you are doing.

Best,
RW

 

EMFs – Cause DNA Damage

by

EMFs Well-Known to Cause DNA Damage

Thank you Dr. Mercola for putting this report out there!

Dr. Martin Blank, PhD, of Columbia University and one of the most experienced researchers of the cellular and molecular effects of EMFs in the United States, gave an informative speech at the November 18, 2010 Commonwealth Club of California program, “The Health Effects of Electromagnetic Fields,” co-sponsored by ElectromagneticHealth.org.

Dr. Blank spoke with deep experience and commanding authority on the impact of EMFs on cells and DNA, and explained why your DNA, with its ‘coil of coils’ structure, is especially vulnerable to electromagnetic fields of all kinds. As described in the International Journal of Radiation Biology, DNA possesses the two structural characteristics of fractal antennas, electronic conduction and self-symmetry.iii

These properties contribute to greater reactivity of DNA to electromagnetic fields than other tissues, making the long-term consequences of repeated microwave exposures to our genetic material of great concern. Dr. Blank is adamant when he says that there IS evidence of harm, and that the harm can be significant. He also points out that the science showing harmful effects has been peer-reviewed, published, and that the results have been replicated, evaluated and “judged by scientists capable of judging it.”

Even barring all the scientific evidence, it simply makes sense that laptops, cell phones and other wireless technology can impact the human body once you understand that your body is bioelectric. Your body contains electrons that keep an electrical current flowing, and inside every cell are mitochondria, the ‘power plants’ of the cell that respond to the body’s natural electromagnetic fields.

As Dr. Maret explains in an interview with ElectromagneticHealth.org, your body is a complex communication system where cells, tissues, organs, and organisms “talk” — it’s a veritable “electronic symphony in your body.”iv This communication includes finely tuned bio-electrical transmitters and receivers, which are tuned like tuning into a radio station. And when you expose a radio antenna to a significant amount of external noise, you get static, and that is what is happening to your body in today’s EMF-saturated environment.

The Truth about Smart Meters and what to do about it.

by

This video is a great explanation of what a smart meter really is. It does not address the health risks in any fashion.. That information can be found in the Environmental Medical article.
Please watch this 4 min. very important video and below it is the letter he speaks of…Thank you for such a wonderful and concise explanation.

To:
Energy Provider
Street Address
City State Zip

Date of letter

NOTICE OF NO CONSENT TO TRESPASS AND SURVEILLANCE, NOTICE OF LIABILITY

Dear (Energy Provider) and all agents, officers, employees, contractors and interested parties,

If you intend to install a “Smart Meter” or any activity monitoring device at the above address, you and all other parties are hereby denied consent for installation and use of all such devices on the above property. Installation and use of any activity monitoring device is hereby refused and prohibited. Informed consent is legally required for installation of any surveillance device and any device that will collect and transmit private and personal data to undisclosed and unauthorized parties for undisclosed and unauthorized purposes. Authorization for sharing of personal and private information may only be given by the originator and subject of that information. That authorization is hereby denied and refused with regard to the above property and all its occupants. “Smart Meters” and digital meters violate the law and cause endangerment to residents by the following factors:
1. They individually identify electrical devices inside the home and record when they are operated causing invasion of privacy.
2. They monitor household activity and occupancy in violation of rights and domestic security.
3. They transmit wireless signals which may be intercepted by unauthorized and unknown parties. Those signals can be used to monitor behavior and occupancy and they can be used by criminals to aid criminal activity against the occupants.
4. Data about occupant’s daily habits and activities are collected, recorded and stored in permanent databases which are accessed by parties not authorized or invited to know and share that private data by those who’s activities were recorded.
5. Those with access to the smart meter databases can review a permanent history of household activities complete with calendar and time-of-day metrics to gain a highly invasive and detailed view of the lives of the occupants.
6. Those databases may be shared with, or fall into the hands of criminals, blackmailers, corrupt law enforcement, private hackers of wireless transmissions, power company employees, and other unidentified parties who may act against the interests of the occupants under metered surveillance.
7. “Smart Meters” are, by definition, surveillance devices which violate Federal and State wiretapping laws by recording and storing databases of private and personal activities and behaviors without the consent or knowledge of those people who are monitored.
8. It is possible for example, with analysis of certain “Smart Meter” data, for unauthorized and distant parties to determine medical conditions, sexual activities, physical locations of persons within the home, vacancy patterns and personal information and habits of the occupants.
9. Your company has not adequately disclosed the particular recording and transmission capabilities of the smart meter, or the extent of the data that will be recorded, stored and shared, or the purposes to which the data will and will not be put.
10. Electromagnetic and Radio Frequency energy contamination from smart meters exceeds allowable safe and healthful limits for domestic environments as determined by the EPA and other scientific programs.

I forbid, refuse and deny consent of any installation and use of any monitoring, eavesdropping, and surveillance devices on my property, my place of residence and my place of occupancy. That applies to and includes “Smart Meters” and activity monitoring devices of any and all kinds. Any attempt to install any such device directed at me, other occupants, my property or residence will constitute trespass, stalking, wiretapping and unlawful surveillance and endangerment of health and safety, all prohibited and punishable by law through criminal and civil complaints. All persons, government agencies and private organizations responsible for installing or operating monitoring devices directed at or recording my activities, which I have not specifically authorized in writing, will be fully liable for a fee of $100,000.00 for any violations, intrusions, harm or negative consequences caused or made possible by those devices whether those negative consequences are provided by “law” or not.

This is legal notice. After this delivery the liabilities listed above may not be denied or avoided by parties named and implied in this notice. Civil Servant immunities and protections do not apply to the installation of smart meters due to the criminal violations they represent.

Notice to principal is notice to agent and notice to agent is notice to principal. All rights reserved.

Signature

Our Constitution must be upheld.

by

In every state in every arena we are witnessing the demise of our constitution. The forced attachment of a spy device on our homes disguised as an “electric meter” is one of the final blows to our freedom. It represents the complete disregard for the peoples health and welfare.
We as a nation, as a people must find the strength to stand up and stand up now or be lost in a sea of tyranny having our free spirits and our freedoms silenced forever. Please see post for details.

The video below is not an endorsement for any candidate..It is a meaningful reminder of who we are and what this country stands for… In the words of John F Kennedy, Martin Luther King, George Washington and many more.

Let this message touch your heart and know your voice may be the one that tips the scales..We the people must stand up and let the truth be heard.  Be the beacon of light you were put here to be.

Thank you for watching and for your support and continued action.

The Video Below is Bob Frank speaking in Las Vegas at the PUCN hearing
on Smart Meters June 19, 2012.
There were over 20 speakers and all made great, valid and factual speeches. limited to 5 min.

Please click to see and hear the truth about what a smart meter really is…

 

Smart Meters – Big Brother of our day

by

This article is long and worth the read with valuable information.
True EMF Solutions – gives and shows all authors and credits for this article.

From Canada Free Press
Smart Meters – Big Brother of our day
Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh
_______________________

The American Academy of Environmental Medicine advised on January 12,
2012 in a letter addressed to the Public Utilities Commission of the
State of California that they opposed “the installation of wireless
smart meters in homes and schools based on a scientific assessment of
the current medical literature. Chronic exposure to wireless
radiofrequency radiation is a preventable environmental hazard that is
sufficiently well documented to warrant immediate preventative public
health action.”

“Exposure to levels of radio frequency RF (3KHz-300GHz) and extremely
low frequency ELF (300Hz) produced by smart meters warrants immediate
and complete moratorium on their use and deployment until further
study.”

The FCC guidelines that deem smart meters safe are obsolete because
they study only “thermal tissue damage and overlook genetic and
cellular effects, hormonal effects, male fertility, blood/brain
barrier damage, and increased risk of certain types of cancer from RF
and ELF levels similar to those emitted by smart meters.”

As each home becomes a “wireless telecommunications facility,”
children are particularly at risk for altered brain development,
impaired learning, and behavior.”

Current safety limits on pulsed RF are considered “not protective of
public health” by the Radiofrequency Interagency Working Group (FDA,
OSHA, EPA, FCC). Emissions of smart meters have been classified by
the World Health Organization International Agency for Research on
Cancer (IARC) as a possible human carcinogen.

The Congressional Research Service and its legislative attorneys
prepare reports for Congress on various issues. Two such reports were
issued on smart meters. “Smart Meter Data: Privacy and Cybersecurity”
was published on February 3, 2012 and “The Smart Grid and
Cybersecurity – Regulatory Policy and Issues” was published on June
15, 2011.

The writers agreed, “unforeseen consequences under federal law may
result from the installation of smart meters and the communications
technologies that accompany them.” In addition, the information
“generated from smart meters is a new frontier for police
investigations.”

The Fourth Amendment requires police to have probable cause to search
areas in which people have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Courts
deny protection to information a customer gives to a business as part
of their commercial relationship. Thus, police can access bank
records, phone, and traditional utility records through the “third
party doctrine.” Technology can erode an individual’s privacy even
more.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 gave stimulus money
to electric utilities to accelerate the deployment of smart meters to
millions of homes via the Department of Energy’s Smart Grid Investment
Grant Program. Developers thought that the old patchwork
infrastructure did not interface, was an arcane system of electricity
delivery, and had to be replaced by a nationwide system called the
Smart Grid that could be easily controlled and manipulated from a
central location.

Smart meter technology is part of the Advanced Metering Infrastructure
(AMI). It records near-real time data on electricity usage, it
transmits data to the Smart Grid, and it “receives communication from
Smart Grid such as real-time energy prices, or remote commands that
can alter a consumer’s electricity usage to facilitate demand
response.”

In case you misunderstand what demand response is, here is the
official definition. “Demand response is the reduction of the
consumption of electric energy by customers in response to an increase
in the price of electricity or heavy burdens on the system.” Notice
that the reduction in consumption is not defined as voluntary when
there is a heavy burden on the system, and it incorporates the promise
by the President that our electricity prices will skyrocket.

Smart meters are designed to decrease peak demand for electricity by
turning off electricity to customers by remote. Remotely controlled
thermostats will also turn off air conditioning units.

HVAC contractors are required to install programmable thermostats on
all systems in areas where city officials have inspection authority
created by city councils. Thermostats can be overridden by the smart
meter so that a home’s temperature can also be remotely controlled.
RFID tracking tags will be gradually installed in all items purchased,
including digital thermostats. Non-digital thermostats cannot be
tracked and will thus be banned.

The Department of Energy used the $4.5 billion stimulus to reimburse
up to 50 percent of smart grid investments, including the cost to
electric utilities of buying and installing smart meters. As of
September 2011, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) funded
7.2 million smart meters and partially 15.5 million. The Institute for
Electric Efficiency (IEE) expects 65 million smart meters in operation
by 2015.

The issues for those who generate, seek, or use the data recorded by
smart meters are varied.

Privacy of electronic communications
Data storage
Computer misuse
Foreign surveillance
Consumer protection
Cybersecurity
Hacking
Health issues
Higher energy costs for consumers
Solar flares
Electromagnetic pulse (EMP)

The myriad of legal entanglements cannot be predicted. According to
Richard J. Campbell, Specialist in Energy Policy, “It is unclear how
Fourth Amendment protection from unreasonable search and seizures
would apply to smart meter data, due to the lack of cases on this
issue.”

Smart meter technology measures usage as frequently as once every
minute, which appliances a consumer is using, what time of day, if a
residence is occupied, how many people reside there, if it’s occupied
by more people than usual, daily schedules, including times when they
are or away from home or asleep, if homes have alarm systems, if they
own expensive electronic equipment such as plasma TVs, if they use
certain types of medical equipment.” (Department of Energy)

Utility providers match data on electricity usage with “known
appliance load signatures” and daily schedules by observing when
residents use most electricity. U.S. v. Kyllo subpoenaed electricity
spreadsheet records because they suspected an indoor marijuana growing
operation. Imagine how much easier it would be today with smart
meters.

According to Jeffrey Carr, “Health insurance companies could determine
if a house uses certain medical devices and appliance manufacturers
could establish if a warranty has been violated.”

Smart meters collect and store data on names, service address, billing
information, networked appliances, meter IP address, transactional
records, and identity of the transmitter. Data is sent to the grid via
twisted–copper phone lines, cable lines, fiber optic cable, cellular,
satellite, microwave, WiMAX, power line carrier, and broadband over
power line. Wireless costs less but cybersecurity becomes a huge issue
because data is stored within the grid and within the physical world.

Smart meters can give police access to eating, sleeping, showering
habits, appliance use and when, TV use, and exercise equipment use
take place. Does this uphold the Fourth Amendment that the “right of
the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated”?

Liberties in the Constitution apply only to actions by the state and
federal governments. Utilities can be privately owned, publicly owned,
federally operated, and non-profit cooperatives. Under “public records
theory, law enforcement can request smart meter data since public
records are not afforded Fourth Amendment protection. Law enforcement
access to state public records is unrestricted.” (Slobogin, Nilson v.
Layton City)

Each state has different rules on whether utility records are public
records. For example, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and North
Carolina consider a person’s utility records as public records.

“Third party doctrine,” words told to another person, informant,
agent, gave police access to documents in the past such as phone,
bank, cell phone, hotel records. Utility records were treated
similarly, leaving room for smart meter records abuse.

Hackers could easily capture data from the outside with a hand-held
device, sell the information to the highest bidder, or establish
patterns in order to rob the house.

A court warrant should be required to access the data but neither the
Supreme Court nor any lower federal court has ruled on the use of
smart meters.
Perhaps people should think twice before they accept the $100 check
offered by their utility companies in order to “save the planet” and
reduce electric bills

Utilities may sell or share data obtained from smart meters with
others in order to increase revenues. Utilities are monopolies and
customers cannot switch providers in order to avoid the invasion of
privacy. Electricity is a necessary component of modern life.

“Advancement of technology threatens to erode further the
constitutional protection of privacy.” Individuals face a higher risk
that activities inside their homes will be monitored by the
government. (Congressional Research Service)

Perhaps people should think twice before they accept the $100 check
offered by their utility companies in order to “save the planet” and
reduce electric bills. Ask the Californians who have filed a
class-action lawsuit against PG&E after smart meters were installed
and their electric bills have skyrocketed. Is a small $100 bribe meant
to help you or hurt you?

Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh
Most recent columns

“Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh ( Romanian Conservative) is a freelance
writer (Canada Free Press, Romanian Conservative), author, radio
commentator, and speaker. Her book, “Echoes of Communism, is available
at Amazon in paperback and Kindle. Short essays describe health care,
education, poverty, religion, social engineering, and confiscation of
property. Visit her website, ileanajohnson.com.